Consultants – the growing trend for law firms and lawyers

There often comes in time in the life of solicitors at senior associate or salaried partner level that they have to move on. The firm goes bust. The Politics. Personality issues. The promise of equity that fails to materialise……

Traditionally, many such solicitors simply go back into the labour market, looking for the same thing somewhere else, hoping for better luck next time, touting around the client following they have and negotiating a salary upon this basis. Some harbour ambitions to float their own boat with more control over their day to day working lives but are put off by the expense and risk of setting up as a sole practitioner. Funding may not be easy to come by. Clients may want the comfort of knowing that they aren’t relying on a one man band.

One increasingly common option is for solicitors to work upon a self-employed consultancy basis, not as a locum, but providing their services to their clients through an established law firm such as Gannons or Cubism law which operate in this way, in a similar fashion to barristers working at chambers. The law firm takes a percentage of sums billed and collected in return for which PI cover, premises/meeting rooms, secretarial/admin/IT and accounts support and access to legal know how/precedents is provided. So far as the consultant is concerned, the firm will also need to have sufficient resources, brand and market presence to provide the comfort to the consultant’s client base needed to keep them loyal and to help her in marketing to new clients.

The firm may well have clients to refer to the consultant. Such access to clients will come with non-poaching undertakings. However, the consultant can expect not to be bound by restrictive covenants in respect of clients she introduces to the business, as she would be if she came on board as an employee.

In addition, because consultants aren’t employees, they aren’t required to behave as such. They can manage their time as they see fit and, in this age of remote access, can work at home. The promise of a “genuine work life balance” is a more genuine one that offered to employed solicitors where this usually means part time work with a strict pro rata reduction in income and home working being viewed with mistrust.

The main downside as compared to being employed is, of course, that the consultant has no fixed salary.

However, the percentages that firms offer for consultants in respect of work done for their own clients can mean that if the consultant was able to “wash her face” from her own client base then earnings will probably be greater than as an employee.

The consultant should bear in mind that any reputable firm that she wants to do business with will want some assurance that the costs that they will incur in engaging the consultant will be covered and that the person is competent. Accordingly a consultant would be well advised to prepare not only a CV but a basic business plan and have references to hand before approaching a firm to work with.

Those considering going down the consultant route should also consider setting up a personal service company to trade through. It’s tax effective for both consultants and the firms engaging them.

For the more business minded solicitors the consultant route is perhaps an attractive one, albeit that choosing the right firm to do business with needs careful consideration and a clear idea as to exactly what is on offer, outside of the bald percentage fee split.

Posted in Business Law News | Comments closed

What are my Obligations as a Director?

Directors have a wide range of obligations; this article outlines some of the key responsibilities of directors. The director of a company is ultimately in charge of managing the business and affairs of the company and alongside the company secretary; they must ensure that the business conforms to the Companies Act 2006.

The following are general duties which directors owe to their company:

  1. To exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence.
  2. To exercise independent judgement.
  3. To promote the company’s success.
  4. To act within his powers.
  5. Not to accept a benefit from third parties.
  6. To avoid conflicts of interest and duty.
  7. To disclose his interest in a proposed transaction/arrangement. Read More »
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments closed

Demand for business outsourcing rising fast

Demand for outsourcing services increases

Outsourcing is a process of contracting an existing function or process of a business to an independent company or consultancy and not conducting it in-house. Businesses enter into a contract for exchange of services between a business and a consultancy or an IT company etc. Usually the outsourced functions are not a core part of a business in which it specializes, such as HR in an insurance company. The main reason for outsourcing is to save costs in the long run by focusing efforts on developing the business and ensuring its proper functioning. Read More »

Posted in Business Law News | Tagged , | Comments closed

Closing a limited company

Although a limited company can be established in a matter of hours in the UK, and for as little as £50-£100, closing down a limited company is considerably more complex. The best method applicable to closing down a limited company depends on whether that company is solvent or insolvent (i.e. whether it still has outstanding debts).

If you are unsure how to close down your company, or what method to use, it is advisable you speak to a professional (this may be an insolvency practitioner or a solicitor specialising in the field). Read More »

Posted in Company law, David Swede commercial law | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Mergers and acquisitions

Mergers and acquisitions is a legal and business term that refers to the aspect of corporate strategy, financing and project management of buying, selling or restructuring different legal entities. Mergers and acquisitions are particularly relevant to rapidly expanding businesses that want to establish themselves in new business fields or geographical locations without creating brand new legal entities such as companies or entering into joint ventures. In modern times, the formal distinction between the terms “merger” and “acquisition” has become less significant, as particularly in business sense both create the same result. For clarity, however an acquisition happens when a business buys another business, taking full control over it. A merger is when a business partially absorbs another business, ultimately not fully controlling it but sharing the decision-making with the old owner. Read More »

Posted in Reena Gokani Commercial law | Comments closed

Sale of Goods Act summary

Sale of Goods Act

What is it?

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SOGA) aims to provide protection for consumers buying goods when their purchases are not quite what they paid for. The Act regulates the relationship between the seller and the buyer and ensures that the goods sold fit their description as well as their purpose and if they do not the seller is under an obligation to correct the wrong by providing a refund or replacement. Read More »

Posted in David Swede commercial law | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Dissolving a business partnership

Dissolution of a business partnership largely depends on the type of partnership in question. There are three types of partnerships, namely general, limited, and limited liability partnerships.

Dissolving a General Partnership (No agreement)

What is general partnership?

  • General partnership is the most basic legal form of partnership available. For general partnership to exist there need to be at least two people running a ‘for profit’ business. General partnerships do not offer protection against personal liabilities. Therefore, each partner is responsible for the debts of the entire partnership. Read More »
Posted in David Swede commercial law, Practical business explanations | Tagged , , , | Comments closed

Pre-emption rights for shares

Pre-emption rights for shares are the rights for an existing shareholder of a company to be offered new shares in that company before those new shares are then offered to non-shareholders publicly. These rights state that new share issues have to be offered to existing shareholders at the same price (or a more favourable price) as they would have been offered to a non-shareholder. The main reasoning behind this is to allow existing shareholders the right to prevent the dilution of their stake in a company by being able to purchase the new shares; if they decide not to proceed with the sale then they are agreeing to this potentially happening.

Company law (in the form of the Companies Act 2006) and listing rules state that pre-emption rights are required for publicly traded companies. It is possible for private companies to exclude the requirement of pre-emption rights, providing the correct procedures have been followed. Pre-emption rights arise on the transmission, transfer and allotment of shares. Listing rules requirements do not apply to companies which are listed and incorporated abroad. This is mainly due to the fact that the pre-emption rights principle is not internationally and universally recognised. Read More »

Posted in Company law, David Swede commercial law | Tagged , , | Comments closed

Lottery syndicate agreement

Lottery Syndicate Agreement

What is a lottery syndicate agreement?

A syndicate is a collection of people, businesses or entities who organise themselves for a common purpose. A lottery syndicate agreement is where people group together and enter lottery draws to maximise the chances of winning. The situations in which people get together to form lottery syndicates necessarily mean that members will be friends, colleagues or associates. It is important to follow the correct procedures in setting up a syndicate so that the situation does not turn sour upon a win. Failing to do so can lead to the breakup of friendships, the end of working relationships and the loss of money in some cases. Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments closed

UCTA – Unfair Contract Terms Act

UCTA

What is it?

The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) regulates the terms which can be included in certain contracts. Usually businesses are allowed to agree whatever they want to, and the law does not restrict what can be put in a contract. However, in certain circumstances UCTA restricts the terms which are deemed valid when they are unfair. In particular, UCTA sets out a number of rules dictating when a business is allowed to put an exclusion clause in a contract which is intended to exclude or restrict their liability. Read More »

Posted in David Swede commercial law, Practical business explanations | Comments closed